tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883128923960255063.post5086077529130865487..comments2024-03-27T00:12:37.028-07:00Comments on EGS India | Official Blog: Synchronous Technology from Siemens - History-Free modelling - Myth or Reality?EGS Indiahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05933062010866024038noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883128923960255063.post-54915294122682364482022-04-22T03:37:33.609-07:002022-04-22T03:37:33.609-07:00Very nice blog post, it is very informative blog
...Very nice blog post, it is very informative blog<br /><br /><a href="https://turboems.com/" rel="nofollow">Export software</a>Turbo ERPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18421421126054994266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883128923960255063.post-63395064599943274022008-08-25T14:08:00.000-07:002008-08-25T14:08:00.000-07:00I keep hearing "parametrics" and "h...I keep hearing "parametrics" and "history" being interchanged as if it is the same thing. It is not! Solid Edge with Synchronous Technology still has parametrics in the ST model, what they do not have is the multiple layers of associative dependency (history). This means I can still drive features with dimensions and I can have one parameter drive another without having to worry about a face being deleted, which orphans a sketch plane, which orphans a sketch, which fails a feature.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883128923960255063.post-90490853712443419412008-08-04T04:10:00.000-07:002008-08-04T04:10:00.000-07:00Dears, i have been a user of both works and Edge f...Dears, i have been a user of both works and Edge for the last 7 years. In my opinion there was no difference between the two except a few bells here and a few whistles there. While Solid Works would always keep point no.1 "The bi directional associativity between model and 2d views" as a must have, i am yet to see anyone using that in real production environment.<br>Same goes true for many a things at Solid Edge level.<br>However, synchronous technology from Siemens surely seems to be a diffrentiator, let's give it to Siemens for their real breakthrough. I am sure if Solid Works would have come out of this first, they would have blown even bigger bells and Drums.<br>I also saw the video from Solid Works ridculing Synchronous Technology by making a few changes to a engine casing, the video showed Works took 13 seconds with Traditional modelling approach to change the size of the hole, while the same change with ST took a second.<br>So once again guys, let's give it to Siemens PLM and let the user be the real judge.<br>Any technology that get's launched has room for development. This is the first release and i can see it is production ready for prismatic components atleast.<br>Cheers.<br>A2ZAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883128923960255063.post-12531303969778766222008-06-30T21:48:00.000-07:002008-06-30T21:48:00.000-07:00This is not really a convergence, this is one appr...This is not really a convergence, this is one approach or the other. You can use the direct editing technology or the parametric technology. But you can't use them both at the same time on the same data.<br><br>It's realy like having two separate software packages, which is the part that Siemens is not communicating very well.<br><br>You are also completely stuck if you have any geometry other than dead simple prismatic shapes with round fillets. No options whatsoever with general NURBS shapes.<br><br>I think for very simple parts, this will be useful, but only marginally more useful than any of the existing tools that do the same thing or nearly the same thing. The only really unparalleled thing here is the hype.Matt Lombardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5883128923960255063.post-91274239107381482172008-06-18T03:08:00.000-07:002008-06-18T03:08:00.000-07:00Ya. I agree with you. Parametric modeling looks sa...Ya. I agree with you. Parametric modeling looks safer. One of the simple example: I can suppress and unsppress a feature depending on design variations or during design iterations. But how it is possible in direct modeling?<br><br>We have appreciate the new technology. But in reality how it can help a designer to do his job better?<br><br>It is still a question mark for me. Let us wait and see ..... <br><br>By<br>RajAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com